Why is JavaScript called JavaScript? Named by Netscape in 1995, JavaScript was intended to piggyback off the buzz of Sun Microsystems’ Java. Despite shared syntax elements, they’re distinct languages.
Join us as we delve into the fascinating backstory of this web development titan.
In the 90s, a fresh breeze blew through the digital landscape. A new language appeared, with Brendan Eich at the helm. JavaScript (JS) emerged, sparking curiosity with its name. Why was it named JavaScript?
Brendan Eich played an integral role in this saga. He got a job at Netscape Communications in April 1995. The goal? Create a new language for the Netscape Navigator browser. Eich initially aimed to embed Scheme, a LISP dialect, in the browser.
However, management had different ideas. They pushed for a language more approachable to Web designers and part-time programmers. This requirement led to the creation of Mocha, the nascent version of JavaScript.
This early version, Mocha, came to life over ten days in May 1995. This whirlwind development period gave rise to a language that would revolutionize web interactivity. But Mocha? It didn’t have quite the ring Netscape desired. The language soon became LiveScript in the beta releases of Netscape Navigator 2.0. But a final name change was on the horizon.
Around the same time, Sun Microsystems released a new language of their own: Java. Aiming to piggyback on Java’s increasing buzz, Netscape struck a deal with Sun in December 1995. Netscape would rename LiveScript to JavaScript, associating their language with the hot, new trend. Yet, despite sharing a name, Java and JavaScript have little in common beyond basic syntax and a C-style structure.
Netscape released JavaScript to the world through their Netscape Navigator 2.0 in December 1995. The name JS, driven by marketing rather than technical relation, ended up causing confusion. People began assuming JS was a spin-off or smaller version of Java, given the shared moniker. Despite this misconception, the language thrived.
What’s more interesting, in my opinion, is that JS evolved independently of Java, becoming its own powerful language. It brought dynamic interactivity to the web, something that HTML and CSS alone couldn’t achieve. JS enabled websites to respond to user interactions in real time, making websites feel alive and user-friendly.
JS had its growing pains, though. Critics frowned upon its loose typing and interpreted nature. Yet, developers found beauty in its flexibility and the open doors it offered for client-side scripting. Web applications began to take on a life of their own, growing more dynamic and interactive than ever before.
ECMAScript became the standardized name for JS in June 1997. The European Computer Manufacturers Association (ECMA) wanted to ensure browser compatibility, so they took it upon themselves to standardize the language. JS is essentially ECMAScript at its core, but it includes additional features not described in the ECMA specifications.
Despite the complexities and confusion surrounding JS’s name, one cannot deny its impact on the web. JS has grown exponentially in popularity and use. In fact, as a seasoned JS developer myself, I can’t imagine the web without it. It enables us to create dynamic, engaging experiences for users around the globe.
Today, JS stands strong as one of the most popular programming languages. Despite its quirky beginnings and the confusion around its name, JS has proven itself time and time again.
It has evolved from a browser scripting tool to a robust language capable of handling server-side computation, mobile app development, and even machine learning. JS has shown that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, or in this case, code as effectively.
As we look back at JavaScript, we can see a journey filled with unexpected turns. From its inception as Mocha to its confusing association with Java, JS had quite the road to walk. But it took those steps with purpose and has since grown into a powerhouse of the digital world.
JS continues to evolve, adapt, and impress, proving that a name is just a name.
What truly matters is the substance behind it. And in that regard, JS has never been lacking.
So, why is JavaScript called JavaScript? A mix of strategy, coincidence, and the need for a language that was both user-friendly and versatile. Its name may link it to Java, but it has carved out its own identity, independent and strong.
JS has grown far beyond its humble beginnings, becoming a language that drives the interactive web as we know it today. As a JavaScript developer, I can attest to the importance and effectiveness of this robust language. Its potential is as vast as the digital world it helps shape.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Do Java and JavaScript share similar functionalities because of their names?
Although the names might suggest otherwise, JS and Java are quite different. Java is a statically typed, compiled language, while JS is dynamically typed and interpreted.
Code Sample: JavaScript vs. Java Syntax
// JavaScript let greeting = "Hello, World!"; console.log(greeting);// Java
public class HelloWorld {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String greeting = "Hello, World!";
System.out.println(greeting);
}
}
2. Can JavaScript run Java code since they share part of the same name?
No, JS cannot run Java code. The similarity in names is a result of marketing strategies from the 90s and not because of technical compatibility.
3. What does JavaScript have to do with ECMAScript?
ECMAScript is a standard for scripting languages, and JS is essentially an implementation of this standard. It includes additional features not described in the ECMA specifications.
4. Did JavaScript always have the same name?
No, JS was initially named Mocha, then LiveScript before finally being named JavaScript in December 1995.
5. If JavaScript is different from Java, why does it have a similar syntax?
JS and Java share similar syntax due to their roots in the C programming language. However, they diverge significantly in terms of functionality, object orientation, and data types.
Code Sample: Object Orientation in JavaScript vs. Java
// JavaScript let obj = { name: "JavaScript", age: 27 }; console.log(obj.name); // Outputs "JavaScript"// Java
public class Language {
String name;
int age;
Language(String name, int age) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Language java = new Language("Java", 26);
System.out.println(java.name); // Outputs "Java"
}
}
Nicole is a highly accomplished technical author specializing in scientific computer science. With a distinguished career as a developer and program manager at Accenture and Nike, she has showcased exceptional leadership skills and technical expertise in delivering successful projects.
For the past 22 years, Nicole’s unwavering interest has been in JavaScript web development. Since the early days of its release, she has immersed herself in the intricacies of the language, exploring its vast potential and harnessing its capabilities to create dynamic and interactive web solutions. Nicole’s expertise in JavaScript extends to various frameworks and libraries, positioning her as a trusted authority in the field.
As a technical author, Nicole remains committed to staying at the forefront of emerging technologies and driving innovation in scientific computer science. Her expertise in JavaScript web development, coupled with her experience as a developer and program manager, positions her as a valuable resource for professionals seeking guidance and best practices. With each publication, Nicole strives to empower readers, inspire creativity, and push the boundaries of scientific computer science.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website and show you relevant advertising. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. To find out more read our